Saturday, 9 October 2010

Documentary Analysis (Sustika and Anju)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/8701959.stm

Sound 
Non-diegetic sound of the classical North Korean music is played at the background and this connotes that the people in North Korea are more traditional, along with this non diegetic music we can hear a diegetic sound of a troops training and a voice over (non diegetic music). In most of the scene sound person has used both diegetic and non-diegetic sound (voice over) together. I have even noticed that When we hear voice over at the back of the scene the sound of the diegetic music becomes lower then the non diegetic music. 


Editing
Here in this documentary the editor has used lots of cuts from one scene to another. 
Eye line match is also used in this documentary which helps the audience to understand the relationship between two characters or to show the audience what the character is looking at.


Cinematography
The documentary starts with the medium low angle of statue to show the statue superior and cuts to the medium long shot of other statue. The scene cuts back to the medium close up shot of the monk to show the facial details of the character and cuts back to the medium long shot of the image of the president to connote the importance of the character. The scene cuts to the extreme shot of the students assembling in the line to march in front of the important figures of North Korea to show the importance of culture to the audience. The scene cuts to the extreme long shot of women wearing army dresses to show the women dominating society. The scene cuts to 3 shot of the children dancing and singing to show that even the new generation is trying hard to preserve their culture. The long shot and tracking movement of the characters bowing in the occasion to show the perseverance of the culture. The close up shot of the officer is used to show the facial expression of the character and the rule of third is also used to show the interview .

Mise-en-scene 
The costume Black suit is used to convey the audience that the Korea is of 21st century. The yellow national dress is used to show the audience that the people in korea still preserves their culture. The uniform of the officer connotes the war. It shows that the war between North and South could start any time and the north koreans are ready for it.

The prop red flag is used which connotes patriotic whereas red connotes danger, death, blood. The prop flower is used to connote new life. The prop statue is used to show the historical figure of North Korea.

The entire documentary is shot in North Korea.

Documentary Analysis

I have chosen to analyze a documentary of historic genre "The Birth of Israel". In this documentary analysis, I will be writing about the 4 main technical aspects :Mise-en-scene, Cinematography, Sound and Editing, and how the director has used this techniques to attract the audience. 

This documentary is the production and direction of BBC. 




This documentary starts with the long shot of sun setting which connotes the end of day and the new beginning, the music used in the background is Israeli song which lasts for few seconds. It cuts to the Mosque where the rule of third is used and has been edited. The image is in black and white whereas the mosque is in yellow color which connotes brightness and religious. The title sequence- logo of the BBC is shown in Bold letters. The non-diegetic voiceover of Jeremy Bowen "60 years ago......fighting ever since"
 is used to inform the history of Israel because it helps the audience to solve the puzzle of images. From the long shot of the location of Israel fades in to extreme shot to show the beautiful location to keep the audience interested. The editing technique juxtaposition is used to show the shots of Israel's past in black and white which helps the audience differentiate between past and the future. The title of the documentary "The Birth of Israel" is written in Black bold letters. The scene cuts to the tracking movement of Gaza city to entertain the audience. The scene again cuts to the close up shot of the birds following with the tracking shot of man. It cuts back to few people who are busy in their daily life to involve the audience with the attachment of daily life. 
The voice over continues informing the history of Israel.The scene cuts to the high angle and medium shot  to show that the 


refugees are hurt while protesting to show the truth of the real life to audience. The close up shot of the damaged wall and blood is used to connote the death, danger. The scene cuts to the medium close up shot of the flag which connotes patriotic. The non-diegetic music is used for a while. The voice over continues with the close up shot of the missile which has been landed 2miles north to Gaza to show the destruction of war to audience. It also connotes that the many culture and heritage has been destructed. The scene cuts to long shot of the farm which was found in 1930 to show the the preservation of Israel's heritage. The scene cuts to the long shot of people who are busy on their daily life which shows how the humans survived. The scene continues with the diegetic dialogue

"These are the forms of life..."of Shimon Peres which has used rule of thirds with medium shot which is the perfect way to frame the interview. The diegetic dialogue of Hazem Nusseibeh continues with the rule of thirds. The scene cuts to the juxtaposition shots of the cultural heritage which has been blend. The interview of Noah Kligger starts with the diegetic dialogue and medium shot using rule of thirds. The diegetic sound of the gun fire and the blast of bombs continues with the medium long shot of the armies in war. The scene continues with the diegetic dialogue of Jeremy Bowen.

Tuesday, 21 September 2010

Documentary proposal (Group)

“ Is graffiti an expression of art or just another form of vandalism”?
 In this topic, we plan to explore the very controversial idea of graffiti, and whether it seen as an artist portraying a message through the expression of art or just seen as vandalism of the streets in London today.
We will look at both, for positive arguments of graffiti and the negative argument as well. And look at both perspectives of the too sides.

A source shows that it’s a common view that graffiti is frowned upon in society. (http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/club/your_reports/newsid_1637000/1637333.stm)
Graffiti is disgusting and gets people into bad habits, wherever people find a blank space they scribble all over it.”
Although there are many schemes and project that have been set up to remove graffiti. People still show hostility towards it.
Project’s like ‘orange rock corps’ have been set up to remove graffiti, and because it nation wide it covers a wide regional area and these projects have been strongly backed by the government.

In order to finding conclusion to the debate that is graffiti, we will be interviewing people that support graffiti and people that don’t mind it, as well as people who are strongly against graffiti. We also believe that there no better way to see how the artist themselves feel about it so will we also interviewing them and finding there perspectives on what they do. We also intend to interview some public figures to show what they feel about the graffiti. Additionally, we will speak to other general members of the public that hold their own and find out whether they feel the media influences these ideas.

We plan to have cut-always of piece of art that have been produced as well as people doing graffiti. As well as these we plan to show the length that people go through just to “get up” (graffiti) photo’s of black books (Were people design there pieces of work before they put paint to wall)

For a list of speakers I would like to interview 2 graffiti artist’s (one that’s big, and a up and coming one). I would also like to interview people that work on the projects at orange rock corps. As well interviewing companies that remove graffiti them selves and some people that are the general public.

For this our group roles are:

Philip – editor
Lauren - director                       
Sustika – sound
Anju – Camerawoman

Monday, 20 September 2010

Group Role

I have taken a role of "Camera Person"in the group of A2 media coursework whereas Sustika has taken a role of "Sound Person", Lauren has taken a part of "Director" and Philip has taken a role of "Editor". This year we can choose to make a documentary from any genre. The title  of our documentary as chosen by our group is "Graffiti: art, vandalism or political free speech".